United Kingdom recently on the DNA database of controversial _ Danqiu
The beginning of this month, the United Kingdom of a judge in an interview with BBC StephenSedley when the United Kingdom is now described as a DNA database has no room for the defence of the system, he said: "we are in such a situation, if you are caught by the police, your DNA is entered into the database permanently; if not, your DNA data will not be entered into the database. This means that many practical work on criminals, because their DNA is not in the database, police grasp them all can move around freely in the street, no one catch them. " Sedley judges want United Kingdom's DNA database expansion of large as possible, all citizens of the United Kingdom, even to United Kingdom tourism foreign citizens have access to the database. But he also pointed out that the whole database must strictly control purposes, the principle can only be used for crime prevention and detection of cases. United Kingdom's DNA database is the largest of the approximately 4 million records, and still a month 3 million records of speed in growth. Under United Kingdom law, the police only from the accused person collecting DNA, if the parties finally acquitted, then all DNA and fingerprint evidence must be destroyed. If as Sedley and United Kingdom Prime Minister Blair to expect, all United Kingdom all have joined the DNA database, it will greatly save the cost of future cases detected, on all criminals is also a warning (because the crime scene always find DNA samples, unless you wrap up your whole body, ^ _ ^), this can significantly reduce the crime rate. Recent public on missing children cases become more and more attention, many parents United Kingdom National DNA database support, many parents in child a very early age to enter the child's DNA database, hope to be able to quickly after the accident by DNA found children. Over the past 9 months, more than 10 million students data into the database. But the United Kingdom's "human rights fighters" went out, so do not respect people's privacy violation of human rights, they mean shouldn't put those never committed a crime in human DNA is entered into the database. Maybe they one day be poked a knife or home stuff was stolen, but the database also can not find suspects, they will think of the benefits of a national database, ^ _ ^
没有评论:
发表评论